Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0191120210360200135
Journal of Korean Medical Science
2021 Volume.36 No. 20 p.135 ~ p.135
Open Partial Nephrectomy vs. Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy for a Renal Tumor Larger than 4 cm: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis
Lee Sang-Chul

Ryu Ho-Young
Lee Jeong-Woo
Abstract
Background: To compare open partial nephrectomy (OPN) and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in the management of renal tumors larger than 4 cm.

Methods: Clinical records of 220 patients who underwent OPN or RAPN for a single renal tumor ¡Ã 4.0 cm with a normal contralateral kidney were reviewed. After determining the propensity score, surgical parameters, functional outcomes, and oncological outcomes were compared between OPN (n = 67) and RAPN (n = 67) groups of patients.

Results: The RAPN group had longer operation time (149.0 min vs. 173.3 min, P = 0.030) and longer ischemic time (20.3 min vs. 29.4 min, P = 0.001), but shorter hospital stay (8.2 days vs 6.0 days, P = 0.001) than the OPN group. Estimated blood loss (P = 0.053), pain visual analog score at 1 day postoperatively (P = 0.194), and complications of grade III or higher (P = 0.403) were similar between OPN and RAPN groups. There was no radical conversion or positive surgical margin in either group. Mean change in 6-month estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly better in the RAPN group (?8.2 vs. ?3.1, P = 0.027). There was no statistical difference in recurrence-free survival (P = 0.970) or cancer-specific survival (P = 0.345) between the two groups.

Conclusion: RAPN is a safe and feasible surgical modality comparable to OPN for managing renal tumors larger than 4 cm in terms of surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes.
KEYWORD
Open Partial Nephrectomy, Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy, Renal Tumor
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information
SCI(E) MEDLINE ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø